Fears regarding Bangladesh’s sovereignty have intensified amid reports that the interim government, led by the West’s puppet and Nobel laureate Muhammad Yunus, may be facilitating the transfer of Chittagong Port and Saint Martin’s Island to the US.
According to international media and sources, negotiations for these strategic assets are underway, raising alarm about Bangladesh’s role in escalating geopolitical tensions in the Bay of Bengal.
US Strategic Interests and the Quad Initiative
According to a report by The Economic Times, the United States is exploring the development of a Bangladeshi port under the “Quad Ports for the Future” initiative, a collaborative effort involving the Quad nations (US, India, Japan, and Australia). The program aims to counter China’s growing influence in the Indo-Pacific, particularly in the Bay of Bengal, by enhancing maritime infrastructure and securing strategic footholds. Sources indicate that preliminary discussions have already taken place in Dhaka, with a feasibility study in progress to assess the potential development of Chittagong Port. If approved, this could lead to significant US investment and presence in the region, potentially altering the balance of power in South Asia.
Proposal for Saint Martin’s Island
Reports also suggest that the United States has expressed interest in leasing approximately one-third of Saint Martin’s Island, a small but strategically located coral island in the Bay of Bengal, for a 99-year period. Initially proposed as a tourism hub for international visitors, there are concerns that the leased area could eventually be repurposed as a US military base. While the interim government has not publicly opposed the proposal, it is reportedly cautious due to potential objections from regional powers, particularly China and India, both of which have significant stakes in the region’s stability.
Sheikh Hasina’s Concerns and Warnings
Awami League President and five-time Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has repeatedly voiced concerns about foreign interference in Bangladesh’s sovereignty. In recent statements, she warned of a “conspiracy” to undermine Bangladesh’s autonomy by ceding control of strategic assets like Saint Martin’s Island. Hasina has claimed that external powers, particularly the US, are pushing for the establishment of a military base on the island, which could destabilise the region.
How the US is instigating a civil war to take hold of Bangladesh
Exclusive: US troops in Bangladesh ready to invade Myanmar
US-backed drone facility set to launch in Bangladesh soon
She has also raised alarms about a purported plan to carve out a “Christian state” from parts of Bangladesh and Myanmar, drawing parallels to the creation of East Timor. Hasina’s remarks, made during her tenure and echoed in exile, have fueled speculation about foreign agendas in Bangladesh, though concrete evidence remains scarce.
Geopolitical Rivalry in the Bay of Bengal
The Bay of Bengal and the broader Indian Ocean have emerged as a critical theatre in the US-China rivalry. China’s investments in regional infrastructure, such as the deep-sea port in Kyaukphyu, Myanmar, and its Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), have prompted the US to pursue counter-strategies. The US has also taken an active role in addressing the Rohingya crisis, advocating for humanitarian corridors and engaging with Bangladesh on security and development issues. The strategic importance of Chittagong Port, a key maritime hub, and Saint Martin’s Island, located near vital shipping lanes, makes them attractive assets in this geopolitical chessboard.
‘Christian State’ and Regional Instability
Some political analysts and commentators have speculated about a broader conspiracy to destabilise Bangladesh and Myanmar by creating a “Christian state” in the region. This theory, which lacks substantiated evidence, draws comparisons to the secession of East Timor from Indonesia. Proponents of this narrative point to the US’s humanitarian involvement in the Rohingya crisis and its interest in strategic locations as potential precursors to such a plan.
How the US is instigating a civil war to take hold of Bangladesh
How Yunus is implementing UN plot to establish a Christian state
Sheikh Hasina’s warnings about an airbase on Saint Martin’s Island have further amplified these concerns, particularly among nationalist groups in Bangladesh.
Yunus, a US proxy leader
Muhammad Yunus, the interim government’s chief adviser, has faced accusations of serving as a “proxy leader” for Western interests. Critics claim that Yunus’s international stature and connections, including his Nobel Peace Prize, make him a favourable figure for Western powers seeking to influence Bangladesh’s policies. Some unverified sources allege that promises of a high-profile role, such as the United Nations Secretary-General position, have been used to incentivise Yunus to align with US interests and disrupt China’s BRI projects. These claims remain speculative and have not been corroborated by credible evidence.
Challenges to Bangladesh’s Sovereignty
Analysts warn that Bangladesh’s sovereignty and internal stability could be at risk without a transparent and inclusive political process. The interim government’s handling of sensitive issues like foreign investment in strategic assets has drawn scrutiny, particularly given the absence of an elected government. Public discourse on platforms like X reflects growing unease, with many users urging vigilance to prevent Bangladesh from becoming a pawn in global power struggles. Calls for a free, fair, and impartial election have intensified, as citizens and observers emphasise the need for democratic legitimacy to safeguard national interests.
Broader Implications
The controversy over Chittagong Port and Saint Martin’s Island underscores the delicate balance Bangladesh must maintain in navigating superpower rivalries. The country’s strategic location and economic potential make it a focal point for both Western and Chinese interests. While US investment could bring economic benefits, it risks alienating regional powers like China and India, potentially destabilising Bangladesh’s foreign relations. The interim government faces the daunting task of addressing these concerns while ensuring that national sovereignty and public trust are preserved.
As Bangladesh grapples with these allegations and geopolitical pressures, the need for transparency and public engagement has never been greater. The concerns raised by Sheikh Hasina and others highlight the stakes involved in ceding control of strategic assets. Whether the interim government can navigate these challenges without compromising Bangladesh’s autonomy remains to be seen. For now, the nation watches closely as debates over sovereignty, security, and foreign influence continue to unfold.
English